The concrete pad positions every conduit that feeds the cable compartment. Misalignment between conduit stub-up locations and the transformer bushing centerlines is one of the most expensive field corrections — because it requires breaking and re-pouring the pad or accepting permanent bushing stress. The prevention sequence — verifying conduit positions against the transformer dimensional drawing before and after the pour — costs nothing compared to the rework it prevents.
| Parameter | Typical planning tolerance | Consequence of misalignment |
|---|---|---|
| Conduit stub-up location vs compartment floor opening | ±12 mm (0.5 in) | Cable enters at an angle, reducing effective bend radius and introducing lateral force on the bushing |
| Conduit projection above finished pad | Per specification (commonly 75–150 mm) | Too short: water entry risk. Too long: conflicts with compartment equipment and restricts cable bend path |
| Conduit spacing (center-to-center) | ±6 mm (0.25 in) per conduit | Adjacent cables cross or bind inside the compartment, complicating termination access |
| Conduit verticality (plumb) | ≤1° off vertical | Cable exits conduit at a compound angle, applying torsional as well as cantilever stress to the bushing |
| Conduit bell-end clearance inside compartment | ≥50 mm (2 in) from any internal component | Cable rubbing against compartment wall, barrier, or adjacent conduit during thermal cycling |
The tolerances above are practical planning references, not universal code requirements. Project drawings, utility specifications, conduit manufacturer instructions, and site civil drawings govern final acceptance. Always verify tolerances against the project-specific documents before applying these values.